Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28083 WP No. 21749 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 21749 OF 2025 (MV) BETWEEN:
SRI. T.R.R.MANJUNATH S/O LATE N.R.REVANNA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PROP S.R.S.TOURIST, NEAR PRIVATE BUS STAND, TUMKURU-572 103. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.S.PARASARA KUMAR., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, B.H.ROAD, TUMKURU-572 103. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAJAKUMAR.M., AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.A.S.Parasara Kumar., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Rajakumar.M., AGA for the respondent have appeared in person.
Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28083 WP No. 21749 of 2025
2. Though the matter is listed today for preliminary hearing, with the consent of counsel for the respective parties it is heard.
3. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation dated 08.07.2025 vide Annexure-H.
4. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care.
5. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a mandamus may be ordered directing the respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner vide Annexure-H. AGA submits that an appropriate order may be passed. The oral submission made by counsel for the respective parties is placed on record.
6. A mandamus is ordered directing the respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28083 WP No. 21749 of 2025
08.07.2025 vide Annexure-H in accordance with the law within two weeks from today, if not already considered as of today.
7. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP/KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2