Abhimanu Kumar @ Abhimanu Kuamr Singh @ Abhimanyou Kr. Singh @ Abhimanyou Kr. Abhinandan v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./86538/2024 · 2025-02-15
Chandra Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86783 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86783 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86538 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2024 Thana- Sahayak Khajanchi District- Purnia ====================================================== Abhimanu Kumar @ Abhimanu Kuamr Singh @ Abhimanyou Kr. Singh @ Abhimanyou Kr. Abhinandan son of Arvind Kumar Singh @ Arvind Kuamr Mohalla -Jai Prakash Colony, Ward NO 03 PS- Madhubani District -Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Prem Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 15-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sahayak Khazanchi P.S. Case No. 146/2024 dated 26.07.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 310(2), 311, 111, 249 and 238 of the B.N.S. and Section 25(1-B)a and 26 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, 6-7 unknown miscreants are alleged to have committed dacoity in the Tanishq showroom and looted jewelleries worth Rs. Three crore and Seventy lakhs and a mobile phone on the point of gun.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86538 of 2024(2) dt.15-02-2025 2/2 this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused, Bambam Yadav. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has one antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 31.07.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above- named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Purnea in connection with Sahayak Khazanchi P.S. Case No. 146/2024.
7. The application stands allowed.
atul/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T