CWP-22422-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 138 CWP-22422-2025 Date of Decision: 04.08.2025 Anoop Dhillon and others …Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to treat the petitioners at par with other similarly situated contractual employees. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioners will be satisfied in case respondent no.3 is directed to decide their pending representation, dated 18.06.2025, Annexure P-17, in a specified period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Amit Sahni, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents no.1 and 2; Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.3/Parishad and submits that the pending representation, dated 18.06.2025, will be decided by respondent no.3/State Project Director, Haryana School PAYAL 2025.08.05 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-22422-2025 -2- Shiksha Pariyojna Parishad, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of three months. 5. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6. Ordered accordingly. 7. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioners. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 04.08.2025 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2025.08.05 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment