Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:142075 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 9292 of 2025 Petitioner :- Preetam Kumar Mishra Respondent :- Anand Kumar Mishra Counsel for Petitioner :- Prem Shankar Sharma Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
"direct the learned Civil Judge (J.D.) Shahar, Varanasi to decide the interim injunction application 6-C and directed the defendant/respondent not to sell the disputed Arazi should be prohibited to any third party, expeditiously within some stipulated time as directed by this Hon'ble Court."
2. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) filed in Suit No. 1821 of 2022 is pending since 2022 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
3. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
4. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Shahar, Varanasi to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), if not already decided, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 20.8.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad