Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86777 (PNJ)

BANARSI DASS v. PHOOL SINGH AND ANR

RSA/3354/2016 · 2025-03-25

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA-3354- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 229 Banarsi Dass Phool Singh and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) concurrent No. 1/plaintiff’s suit for permanent appellant was directed to take necessary steps to implead the legal heirs of deceased-respondent No. 1. that the sole appellant has expired and pleaded no instructions in the matter. It is accordingly, prayed that the instant with liberty to the same in case, anything survives. appellant would be a futile exercise. It appears that due to sheer long pendency of the present second appea more than 09 -2016 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA Date of Decision: Banarsi Dass Versus Phool Singh and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sumit Gupta, Advocate for the appellant. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The defendant No. 1-appellant concurrent judgments of both the Courts below plaintiff’s suit for permanent was decreed. The matter pertains to the year Vide last order dated 30.09.2024, was directed to take necessary steps to implead the legal heirs of respondent No. 1. Today, learned counsel appearing that the sole appellant has expired and pleaded no instructions in the It is accordingly, prayed that the instant with liberty to the LRs of the deceased-appellant, if any, same in case, anything survives. In the aforesaid premise, issuance of fresh notice to would be a futile exercise. It appears that due to sheer long pendency of the present second appeal before this Court for a period of 09 years, the appellant or his LRs IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-3354-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.03.2025 .… Appellant .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sumit Gupta, Advocate for the appellant. appellant is in second appeal against the both the Courts below whereby the respondent was decreed. pertains to the year 2016. 30.09.2024, learned counsel for the was directed to take necessary steps to implead the legal heirs of appearing for the appellant submits that the sole appellant has expired and pleaded no instructions in the It is accordingly, prayed that the instant appeal may be disposed of appellant, if any, to revive the In the aforesaid premise, issuance of fresh notice to the would be a futile exercise. It appears that due to sheer long l before this Court for a period of appellant or his LRs have lost interest in pursuing in second appeal against the respondent learned counsel for the was directed to take necessary steps to implead the legal heirs of for the appellant submits that the sole appellant has expired and pleaded no instructions in the may be disposed of to revive the the would be a futile exercise. It appears that due to sheer long l before this Court for a period of have lost interest in pursuing RISHU KATARIA 2025.03.28 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-3354- the same, as no attempt has been made by counsel or to engage a new counsel. instant regular second appeal is appellant, if any months from today for reviving the same, 25.03.2025 rishu -2016 (O&M) -2- the same, as no attempt has been made by counsel or to engage a new counsel. Be that as it may, in view of the foregoing circumstances, the instant regular second appeal is disposed of, , if any, to move an appropriate application within a period of 0 months from today for reviving the same, if so, advised. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable the same, as no attempt has been made by them to contact their previous Be that as it may, in view of the foregoing circumstances, the disposed of, with liberty to the LRs of the , to move an appropriate application within a period of 06 if so, advised. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No previous Be that as it may, in view of the foregoing circumstances, the of the RISHU KATARIA 2025.03.28 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.