HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 28294 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. Sri Gaurav Parashar holding brief of Sri A.P. Paul, learned counsel for the petitioners, after some argument, made request that the authority concerned may be directed to adjudicate the complaint dated 28.04.2025, which is appended as annexure no. 9 to the writ petition, in accordance with law in time bound manner. 2. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. 3. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. The authority concerned is directed to adjudicate the complaint and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to all affected parties, expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. September 4, 2025 Pratima Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Prakash Paul, Brij Bhushan Paul Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Ramapati Tiwari And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad