BRIJESH KUMAR SINGH AND 6 OTHERS v. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ELECTRICITY AND 6 OTHERS
A227/9815/2025 · 2025-09-09
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86766 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86766 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 9815 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :-
"i. To set aside the impugned order dated 31/05/2025 passed by Civil Judge Senior Division Sonbhadra on the temporary injunction application in civil suit no. 99/2025(Amit Kumar Singh and others Vs. Executive Engineer, Electricity Transmission Division, Robertsganj, Sonbhadra and Others) to the extent the trial court has refused to grant the ex-parte injunction holding that it does not seem just to pass and ex-parte injunction without hearing the defendants/respondents from the bare perusal of the documents submitted by the Plaintiffs/Petitioners and held that it is necessary to hear the defendants/respondents in the opinion of the court. ii. To direct the defendants/respondents from extending the 132 KV power transmission line over the lands and buildings of the plaintiffs, details of which are mentioned in the annexed schedule, without due acquisition, without payment of appropriate compensation, and without entering into a contract with the plaintiffs also stay the effect and operation of the impugned order dated 31.05.2025 passed on the temporary iniunction application (6- C) to the extent the trial court has refused to grant the ex-parte injunction in civil suit no. 99/2025 (Amit Kumar Singh and others Vs. Executive and Engineer, Electricity Transmission Division, Robertsganj, Sonbhadra and Others)."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the above- mentioned application is pending consideration since 2025 and the same has not been decided till date. Learned counsel prayed that the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Udai Prakash Deo Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Brijesh Kumar Singh And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) Executive Engineer Electricity And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. Since the above-mentioned application is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sonbhadra to decide the above-mentioned application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment.
September 10, 2025 Rishabh A227 No. 9815 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad