Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86760 (PNJ)

HARMINDER WANT SINGH DEOL v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

CRM-M/49869/2022 · 2025-08-26

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 267 CRM-M-49869-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.08.2025 Harminder Want Singh Deol ....Petitioner Versus Central Bureau of Investigation ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. Prabsimran Singh, Advocate for Mr. G.S. Madaan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Akashdeep Singh, SPP, PC for SBI ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel appearing for CBI states that in the FIR that was registered on 04.10.2012, 38 prosecution witnesses already stand examined and there being no interim order, rather a clarification that the pendency of the present petition, shall be no ground for adjournment before the trial Court, in view of which, learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, realizing that the Court is not inclined, prays for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to take all pleas before the trial Court at the appropriate stage, in accordance with law. 2. Ordered accordingly. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 26.08.2025 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2025.08.26 19:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document