HEERAMANI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 10 OTHERS
A227/9472/2025 · 2025-08-22
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86757 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86757 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:145549 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 9472 of 2025 Petitioner :- Heeramani And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Pratap Pal,Kamlesh Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. .1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent and perused the record.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer:
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari quashing the impugned judgment and order dated 29.07.2025 passed by learned civil judge (S.D.) Ballia in Suit no. 823 of 2024 Heeramani and others Vs. Poonam (contain as Annexure no. 1 to this writ petition)."
3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioners have an alternative remedy of filing appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) C.P.C.against the order impugned.
4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition.
5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail the remedy as available to them under law.
6. Certified copy of the orders, if any, be returned to learned counsel for the petitioners after retaining photo copy of the same. Order Date :- 23.8.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad