2025:HHC:29069 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA FAO (FC) No. 7 of 2025 Date of decision: 28 .8 . 2025 Vijay Kumar. ...Appellant. Versus Mehak Chopra. …Respondent. Corum Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Appellant. Mr.Roop Lal Chaudhary, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr.Deepak Kaushal, Senior Advocate, alongwith Mr.Abhishek Verma, Advocate. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge (Oral) FAO (FC) No. 7 of 2025 & CMP No. 3737 of 2025 Learned counsel for the appellant/applicant has submitted that after filing present appeal and application, he has received information that main petition preferred by the appellant Vijay Kumar has been dismissed in default and thereafter application for restoration of the said petition has also been dismissed and therefore, in view of aforesaid subsequent events, after filing of present appeal and application, nothing survives to be adjudicated in present appeal as well as application. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes 2 2025:HHC:29069 FAO (FC) No. 7 of 2025 2. In view of above submissions, present appeal alongwith pending applications is disposed of being infructuous. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. (Sushil Kukreja), Judge. 28th August, 2025 (Keshav)