Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86740 (ALL)

RAJENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/11833/2025 · 2025-08-18

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:141665 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11833 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mukul Yadav,Rajesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent, Ms. Shruti Malviya, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and perused the record. The petitioner has preferred instant writ petition for a direction upon respondent no.2 to grant the pension of the petitioner and pay regular pension and further arrears of the pension and entire retiral benefits along with 18% interest to the petitioner and a further prayer to decide the representation dated 12.12.2024 and 31.12.2024 of the petitioner within stipulated period. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner retired way back in the year 1996 but the pension and regular pension as well as other retiral benefits have not been given to him till date. In this regard, the petitioner has approached the authority concerned by moving representation, however, no heed has yet been paid. Learned counsel for the respondent-BSA submits that there is no averment in the petition as to whether the petitioner is alive or not and also the fact as to whether the formalities for pension have been completed by him. Therefore, the petitioner may be directed to appear before the respondent no.2 along with relevant documents for the release of his pension. In view of the above, the petitioner-Rajendra Singh will appear himself before the respondent no.2; District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Agra on 27.08.2025 along with afresh application/representation, supported by the relevant documents, as may be advised as well as a certified copy of this order. On such application being made, respondent no.2 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after the presence of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. With the aforesaid observation/direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Needless to say that if the petitioner himself does not appear before respondent no. 2, his claim shall stand rejected. Order Date :- 19.8.2025 Jitendra/- Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad