118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-5242-2025 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 06.08.2025 GURSEWAK SINGH ... PETITIONER V/S RANI KAUR ... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. V.S.Rana, Advocate and Mr. Kerrein Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * PARMOD GOYAL , J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought limited relief that his divorce petition be decided in a time-bound manner within a period of three months. On considering the pendency before the Family Court, I do not find any grounds to make proceedings before the learned Family Court time bound. Otherwise also, learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly stated that the matter is now pending for the respondent’s evidence which goes to show that the said case is likely to be decided at an early date. The petition is accordingly, disposed of. The learned Family Court shall take steps to dispose of the divorce petition in accordance with law expeditiously as early as possible. However, no time-bound directions are being given keeping in view the pendency. Disposed of accordingly. 06.08.2025 (PARMOD GOYAL) Janki JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No JANKI BHATT 2025.08.12 13:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh