IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1994 of 2025 ------ 1. Sheikh Lalan @ Sekh Rahim, age about 38 years, son of Sekh Bulu, 2. Sheikh Khushdil, age about 45 years, son of Sekh Bulu, 3. Sheikh Motehar @ Sheikh Matai, age about 67 years, Son of Hanif 4. Sheikh Anajar @ Sk Anajar, age about 22 years, son of Sekh Firoz 5. Sheikh Taj @ Sekh Mahfuj @ Sk Mahfuj, age about 19 years, son of Sekh Mothehar, 6. Sheikh Mithu @ Sekh Asraful Rahaman, age about 32 years, Son of Sekh Hatim, 7. Sheikh Firoj, age about 55 years, Son of Sekh Hanip, 8. Sheikh Tipu @ Sekh Harestulla @ Harestulla, age about 27 years, Son of Sekh Hatem, all Resident of Village –Tesjuria, P.O. –Tesjuria, P.S. –Nala, District –Jamtara. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Kaushal Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 26.03.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Nala P.S. Case No.106 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115, 126(2), 117, 74, 109 & 352 of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners being the members of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of common object of the assembly attempted to murder Noorsalim. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and there was a free fight between the parties. It is next submitted that for the selfsame occurrence, from the side of the petitioners, the petitioner no.6 lodged Nala P.S. Case No. 107 of 2024. It is then submitted that the petitioners have no intention to kill anybody. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.10,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jamtara, in connection with Nala P.S. Case No.106 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile number and a copy of their Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that that they will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-