- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41122 CRP No. 16 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 16 OF 2021 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. T.D. MANJUNATH S/O. DODDAVEERANNA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT THOVINAKERE VILLAGE, C.N.DURGA HOBLI - 572 138 KORATAGERE TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. V.B. SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. GANGADHARA S/O LATE KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 2. SRI. RUDRESHA S/O LATE KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 3. SRI. SIDDAIAH S/O LATE BHEEMANNA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 4. SRI. SHIVARAJA S/O LATE BHEEEMAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41122 CRP No. 16 of 2021 5. SRI.SIDDALINGAIAH S/O MURKANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 6. SRI. JAYARAMAIAH S/O MURKANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, 7. SRI. NANJUNDAPPA S/O LATE KARENANAJAIAH AGED 88 YEARS, 8. SRI.SIDDANANJAPPA S/O LATE KARENANJAIAH AGED 73 YEARS, 9. SRI.RANGAIAH S/O LATE MUDLAPPA AGED 68 YEARS, 10. SRI.THIMMAIAH S/O LATE MUDLAPPA AGED 63 YEARS, ALL ARE R/O VENKATAPURA VILLAGE, KALLAMBELLA HOBLI-572 125 TUMAKURU TALUK AND DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAMACHANDRA R. NAIK, ADVOCATE FOR R3 TO R7 R1 AND R2 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED R8 IS DEAD VIDE ORDER DATED 26.02.2021, NOTICE TO R9 AND R10 ARE DISPENSED WITH R8(C) IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED VIDE ORDER DATED 16.12.2021 NOTICE TO R8(A AND B) IS HELD SUFFICIENT) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41122 CRP No. 16 of 2021 THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC., 1908 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 02.11.2020 PASSED IN O.S.NO.895/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., AT TUMAKURU REJECTING IA FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(a) AND (d) OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo which reads as under: "It is submitted that, the OS No.895/2013, is dismissed by the judgment dated 29.04.2025. Hence the above Revision Petition becomes infructuous. WHEREFORE, the Petitioner prays to dismiss the above Revision petition as infructuous, in the interest of justice and equity." Placing the memo on record, petition stands dismissed as it has rendered infructuous. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17 ct:SG