RSA-857-2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 221 Surjit Singh and another Resham Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. concurrent findings for permanent injunction filed by the plaintiffs was dismissed. 2. was listed for hearing following order was passed by this Court: 3. appellants have been received back duly served. Yet, none has put in appearance on their behalf. 2013 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA Date of Decision: Surjit Singh and another Versus Resham Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the appellants. Mr. Rajbir Wasu, Advocate for the respondent. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The plaintiff-appellants are in second appeal concurrent findings rendered by both the Courts below whereby the suit for permanent injunction filed by the plaintiffs was dismissed. On the last date of hearing i.e. was listed for hearing, the appellants had gone un following order was passed by this Court:- “As per office report dated counsel for the appellant has been duly informed about the date fixed. However, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Let fresh notice be issued 07.08.2025.” As per office report dated 05.08.2025 appellants have been received back duly served. Yet, none has put in appearance on their behalf. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-857-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.08.2025 .… Appellants .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Rajbir Wasu, Advocate for the respondent. appellants are in second appeal against the rendered by both the Courts below whereby the suit for permanent injunction filed by the plaintiffs was dismissed. i.e. 13.01.2025, when this case , the appellants had gone un-represented and As per office report dated 09.01.2025, learned counsel for the appellant has been duly informed about the there is no representation on behalf of Let fresh notice be issued to the appellants, for 05.08.2025, notices issued to the appellants have been received back duly served. Yet, none has put in against the rendered by both the Courts below whereby the suit , when this case , learned counsel for the appellant has been duly informed about the there is no representation on behalf of to the appellants, for the appellants have been received back duly served. Yet, none has put in RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.08 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-857-2013 4. appellants pendency of the present second appeal before this Court for a period of more than 12 as no attempt has been made by a new counsel. 5. instant regular second appeal is 6. 07.08.2025 rishu 2013 (O&M) -2- In the aforesaid premise, issuance of fresh notice would be a futile exercise. It appears that due to sheer long pendency of the present second appeal before this Court for a period of 12 years, the appellants have lost interest in pursuing the same, as no attempt has been made by them to contact a new counsel. Be that as it may, in view of the foregoing circumstances, the instant regular second appeal is disposed of Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable In the aforesaid premise, issuance of fresh notices to would be a futile exercise. It appears that due to sheer long pendency of the present second appeal before this Court for a period of lost interest in pursuing the same, to contact their counsel or to engage Be that as it may, in view of the foregoing circumstances, the disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No would be a futile exercise. It appears that due to sheer long pendency of the present second appeal before this Court for a period of lost interest in pursuing the same, counsel or to engage Be that as it may, in view of the foregoing circumstances, the RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.08 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.