Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86713 (ALL)

SHYAMU AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/28087/2025 · 2025-08-20

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:143519 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28087 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shyamu And Another Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Dubey,Vipul Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "I. To, issue a writ, order or direction in the nature mandamus. commanding and directing the respondent no.2 to decide the Revision No. C202415000001499 (State of U.P. Versus Dhanai) under section 333 of U.P.Z.A and L.R. Act, 1950 as expeditiously as possible preferably by way of day to day hearing within stipulated period." 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that revision filed under Section 333 of U.P. Z.A. and L.R. Act is pending consideration before respondent no. 2 since 2024. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon respondent no. 2 to decide the Revision No. C202415000001499 (State of U.P. Versus Dhanai), in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 21.8.2025 V.S.Singh Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad