SMT. MANORMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/27927/2025 · 2025-09-23
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86694 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86694 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 27927 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. As per submission of learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, age of the petitioner no.1 is not marriageable and as such no cause of action arises in favour of the petitioners for seeking prayer as prayed through the instant petition.
2. In view of the above, prayer sought through the instant petition cannot be acceded to.
3. Writ petition stands dismissed. September 24, 2025 Rakesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sharad Saran Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Smt. Manorma And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad