- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41020 CRP No. 99 of 2012 C/W RFA No. 703 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.99 OF 2012 (SC) C/W REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 703 OF 2009 IN CRP No.99/2012 BETWEEN: S CHANDRASHEKAR S/O S SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT NO.150/36, NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, BANGALORE – 4 …PETITIONER (BY SRI H R MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE) AND: R K RAVINDRA KUMAR, MAJOR, R.K. BUILDERS, ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERS NO.160-A, VANI VILAS ROAD,V.V. PURAM, BANGALORE – 4 …RESPONDENT (BY SMT.THANIMA BEKAL FOR SRI GIRIDHAR.H, ADVOCATES) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.11.2011 PASSED IN S.C.1224/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE XIX-ADDL. JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41020 CRP No. 99 of 2012 C/W RFA No. 703 of 2009 BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY. IN RFA NO. 703/2009 BETWEEN: S.CHANDRASHEKHAR S/O S. SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS NO.156/36, NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL ROAD BANGALORE-560 004 ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. H R MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE) AND: R.K.RAVINDRAKUMAR R.K. BUILDERS, ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS, NO. 160-A, VANI VILAS RD., V.V.PURAM, BANGALORE-560004 ...RESPONDENT (BY SMT. THANIMA BEKAL, FOR SRI GIRIDHAR.H, ADVOCATES) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 CIVIL PROCEDURE AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 2.4.2009 PASSED IN O.S.NO.1039/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE XIV ADDL.CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY. THESE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AND RFA, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41020 CRP No. 99 of 2012 C/W RFA No. 703 of 2009 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Memo filed by the petitioner in CRP No.99/2012 and appellant in RFA No.703/2009. Learned counsel for the respondent has endorsed no objections. 2. Memo in CRP No.99/2012 reads as under: “The undersigned respectfully submits that the matter in the above case has been amicably settled for Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand only) to be payable by the respondent. Accordingly, the respondent has paid and the petitioner has received a sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand only) by cash towards the full and final settlement of his claim. Hence, this memo. Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to kindly dispose of the above petition as amicably settled between the parties, in the ends of justice and equity.” 3. Memo in RFA No.703/2009 reads as under: “The undersigned respectfully submits that, upon advice, the matter in the above case has been amicably settled for Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand only) to - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41020 CRP No. 99 of 2012 C/W RFA No. 703 of 2009 be payable by the respondent in the connected matter in CRP No.99/2012. Having regard to the above, the appellant does not intend to proceed with the above case. Hence, this memo. Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to kindly dispose of the above appeal, in the ends of justice and equity. In view of withdrawal of the above appeal, it is prayed to pass orders for refund the court fee paid on appeal memorandum to the appellant herein.” 4. Sum of Rs.30,000/- rendered in CRP No.99/2012 by the respondent to the petitioner which has resulted in filing the memo in both these matters. 5. Placing the memo on record, revision petition and appeal are dismissed as withdrawn as settled out of Court. 6. Permissible Court fee is allowed. 7. No order as to costs. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR