Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86683 (PNJ)

PARAMJEET KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/8440/2025 · 2025-08-05

Alok Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-8440 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (105) PARAMJEET KAUR STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. Bharatiya Nagarik and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking directions to respondents No.2 to 4 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and her family members at the hands of private respondents. 2. specific threat to the petitioner, learned State counsel submits that a representation filed by the petitioner before the Director General of Police, Punjab, is presently pending consideration before the De Commissioner of Police, Zone 3. despite issuance of notice, the petitioner has failed to appear for recording 8440-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH PARAMJEET KAUR Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Manish Gilhotra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), read with Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking directions to respondents No.2 to 4 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and her family members at the hands of private respondents. Although the petition does not specific threat to the petitioner, learned State counsel submits that a representation filed by the petitioner before the Director General of Police, Punjab, is presently pending consideration before the De Commissioner of Police, Zone-4, Ludhiana. Learned State counsel further submits, on instructions, that despite issuance of notice, the petitioner has failed to appear for recording 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8440-2025 Date of Decision:- 05.08.2025 ……petitioner ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Mr. Manish Gilhotra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), read with Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking directions to respondents No.2 to 4 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and her family members gh the petition does not prima facie disclose any specific threat to the petitioner, learned State counsel submits that a representation filed by the petitioner before the Director General of Police, Punjab, is presently pending consideration before the Deputy 4, Ludhiana. Learned State counsel further submits, on instructions, that despite issuance of notice, the petitioner has failed to appear for recording 1 05.08.2025 ……petitioner ……Respondents The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), read with Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking directions to respondents No.2 to 4 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and her family members disclose any specific threat to the petitioner, learned State counsel submits that a representation filed by the petitioner before the Director General of Police, puty Learned State counsel further submits, on instructions, that despite issuance of notice, the petitioner has failed to appear for recording MANJU 2025.08.12 10:29 I agree to specified portions of this document CRWP-8440 of her statement and has instead approached this Court without dis this fact. 4. vehemently disputing the claim that any such notice was received, does not oppose the fact that the matter is already under consideration before the Deputy Commissioner 5. the office of the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone get her statement recorded. The concerned authority shall then proceed in accordance w 6. August 05, 2025 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: 8440-2025 of her statement and has instead approached this Court without dis Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner, while vehemently disputing the claim that any such notice was received, does not oppose the fact that the matter is already under consideration before the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone-4, Ludhiana. In view of the above, the petitioner is directed to appear before the office of the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone get her statement recorded. The concerned authority shall then proceed in accordance with law. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. August 05, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No 2 of her statement and has instead approached this Court without disclosing with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner, while vehemently disputing the claim that any such notice was received, does not oppose the fact that the matter is already under consideration before the 4, Ludhiana. In view of the above, the petitioner is directed to appear before the office of the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone-4, Ludhiana, and get her statement recorded. The concerned authority shall then proceed in Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 2 closing with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner, while vehemently disputing the claim that any such notice was received, does not oppose the fact that the matter is already under consideration before the In view of the above, the petitioner is directed to appear before 4, Ludhiana, and get her statement recorded. The concerned authority shall then proceed in MANJU 2025.08.12 10:29 I agree to specified portions of this document