Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2025 DAILYLAW 8668 (RAJ)
SMT.TOFALI DEVI W/O LATE SH.HANUMANSAHAI v. BOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS
CW/2904/2002 · 2025-03-26
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8668 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8668 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:13842] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2904/2002 1- guqeku lgk; iq= Jh chatkjke ¼e`rd½ 1@1 Jherh rksQyh nsoh iRuh Lo- Jh guqeku lgk; vk;q 60 o"kZ fuoklh esM+ rglhy fojkVuxj] ftyk t;iqjA 1@2 Jherh dslj iRuh tho.kjke iq=h Lo- Jh guqeku lgk; vk;q 36 o"kZ fuoklh vthrx<+ ftyk lhdjA 1@3 Jherh lq'khyk nsoh iRuh Nktwjke iq= Lo- Jh guqeku lgk; vk;q 35 o"kZ fuoklh /kqokj ftyk vyojA 1@4 Jherh Hkkxk nsoh iRuh jkeiky iq=h Lo- Jh guqeku lgk; vk;q 31 o"kZ fuoklh pkj.kokl] ftyk t;iqjA 1@5 Jherh ykyh nsoh iRuh txnh'k iq=h Lo- Jh guqeku lgk; vk;q 28 o"kZ fuoklh pkj.kokl ftyk t;iqjA 1@6 Jh lqjs'k dqekj iq= Lo- guqeku lgk; vk;q 25 o"kZ fuoklh xzke esM rglhy fojkVuxj] ftyk t;iqjA 1@7 Jh t;izdk'k iq= Lo- Jh guqeku lgk; vk;q 22 o"kZ fuoklh xzke esM rglhy fojkVuxj] ftyk t;iqjA 2- xksfoUn jke iq= Jh chtkjke 3- fcgkjh yky iq= dUgS;kyky 4- jkedj.k iq= dUgS;kyky 5- 'kadj iq= dUgS;kyky 6- Jherh :de.kh iq=h dUgS;kyky 7- Jherh izsensoh iq=h dUgS;kyky 8- lk/kwjke iq= Jh ikapwjke 9- fxj/kjh iq= Jh ikapwjke 10- Jherh X;kjlh nsoh csok Jh ikapwjke leLr fuoklh xzke esM rglhy fojkVuxj] ftyk t;iqjA ----;kphx.k fo:) 1- jktLo e.My jktLFkku vtesjA 2- ewfrZ eafnj Jh eqjyh euksgjth fojkteku xzke esM }kjk iqtkjh ujksRrenkl psyk eqjyhnkl fuoklh esM rglhy fojkVuxj] ftyk t;iqjA 3- jktLFkku jkT; }kjk ftyk dysDVj] t;iqjA ----foi{khx.k
[2025:RJ-JP:13842] (2 of 2) [CW-2904/2002] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Dudi for Mr. Rampal Singh Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Neeraj Batra, GC with Ms. Gunjan Chawla HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 26/03/2025 Indisputably, the issue involved herein is covered by a Full Bench decision of this Court dated 15.07.2015 in the case of Tara and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.: D.B. Civil Special Appeal No.185/2001. However, thereagainst, a special leave petition is pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition is disposed of with following observations as agreed and requested by learned counsels for the respective parties: The Rights of the parties in the subject land shall be governed by the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the SLP preferred against the Full Bench Judgment in the case of Tara and Ors.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J YOGESH/11