1 2025:CGHC:7686 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 876 of 2025 1 - M/s Mahamaya Enterprises (Unit 2 ) Village- Chataud, Kharsa Number 163/7, Mandir Hasaud, Aarang, District- Raipur ( C.G. ). Through- Its Partner Mr. Ram Naik, Aged About 50 Years, S/o Late S D Naik, R/o House No. B2, Super Estate Colony, Mahavir Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur ( C.G. ). 2 - Ram Naik S/o Late Sd Naik Aged About 50 Years R/o House No. B2 Super State Colony, Mahavir Nagar, Raipur District- ( C.G. ). 3 - Kirt Vandan Singh S/o Jitendra Singh Aged About 24 Years R/o House No. C9 Super Estate Colony, Mahavir Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur ( C.G. ). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur ( C.G. ). 2 - Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation. Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur ( C.G. ). 3 - Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Raipur, District- Raipur ( C.G. ). 4 - Collector ( Food Department ) Raipur District- Raipur ( C.G. ). SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.02.13 22:27:16 +0530 2 5 - Tehsildar Anurag, District- Raipur ( C.G. ). 6 - Food Department Collectorate Compound, District- Raipur, (C.G. ). 7 - District Marketing OfÏcer Chhattisgarh State Co- Operative Marketing Federation Maryadit, Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G. ). 8 - Food Corporation Of India Through- Its General Manager Mowa, Raipur, District- Raipur C.G. And Branch OfÏce At Mandir Hasaud, Block Arang, District- Raipur ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Deepanjali Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Ms. Nupoor Sonkar, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent no. 2 & 7 : Shri Shreyansh Mehta, Advocate For Respondent no. 8 : Shri R.S. Patel, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 13.02.2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the rice mill has already been opened by the respondent, therefore this petition has now become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib