Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86679 (PAT)

Salma Tarannum v. The State of Bihar

MJC/4304/2024 · 2025-04-18

Purnendu Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4304 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7562 of 2017 ====================================================== Salma Tarannum D/o.- Late Basiruddin, R/o. Mohalla Ganichak, P.S. Mojahidpur, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Pal, The Secretary, Department of Energy, Government of Bihar, Sichai Bhawan, Patna. 3. Mr. Ajay Sinha, The Chief Engineer, Department of Energy, Government of Bihar, Sichai Bhawan, Patna. 4. Mr. Sanjeet Kumar, The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Electrical Work Circle, Patna. 5. Mr. Vinay Kumar Singh, The Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Works Division, Bhagalpur. 6. Dr. Nawal Kishore Chaudhary, The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur. 7. Mr. Raju Kumar Sharma, The District Education Officer, Bhagalpur. 8. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, The Director, R.D.D.E. Office, Bhagalpur. 9. Mr. Md. Sohail, The Administrative Department, through its Secretary, Government of Bihar. 10. Md. Zafar Imam, Son of Anwari Khatoon, Resident of Village Damaria, P.O. Anishabad, P.S. Gardanibagh, District Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mayank Mohan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shubhash Pd. Singh, GA-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 18-04-2025 Heard Mr. Mayank Mohan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Shubhash Pd. Singh, learned GA-3 for the opposite party/s. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party/s informs that the order dated 27.08.2024 passed Patna High Court MJC No.4304 of 2024(3) dt.18-04-2025 2/2 in CWJC No. 7562 of 2017 has been complied with by passing a reasoned order contained in Memo No. 143 dated 29.01.2025. 3. However, the petitioner, if so desire, he may avail appropriate remedy against the order contained in Memo No. 143 dated 29.01.2025, in accordance with law. 4. The present contempt petition, accordingly, stands consigned. Niraj/- (Purnendu Singh, J) U