IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 116 CWP-22457-2025 Date of Decision: 10.09.2025 NAND LAL ...Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. Maneesh Kumar Bali, Senior Panel Counsel, for the respondents. ***** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) 1. On the last date of hearing, request for adjournment was made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and hearing of the case was deferred to today. 2. Today again, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it can safely be assumed that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present writ petition. 3. Dismissed for non-prosecution. ( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) September 10, 2025 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No HARISH KUMAR 2025.09.11 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment