975 to 978.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 975 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3698 OF 2025 IN WPST/18070/2024 Sangitabai Bhalchandra Mahajan And Others VERSUS Nandkumar Mukunda Patil And Others AND 976 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3699 OF 2025 IN WPST/18068/2024 Dilip Mukunda Kulkarni And Another VERSUS Nandkumar Mukunda Patil And Others AND 977 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3700 OF 2025 IN WPST/18069/2024 Jagannath Baburao Koli VERSUS Nandkumar Mukunda Patil And Others AND 978 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3701 OF 2025 IN WPST/18066/2024 Gendraj Govind Patil And Another VERSUS Nandkumar Mukunda Patil And Others *** • Mr. C. T. Jadhav, Advocate for the Applicants • Mr. B. A. Shinde, AGP for the Respondent/State *** CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J DATE : APRIL 02, 2025 COMMON ORDER : 1. These applications are for restoration of the Umesh PAGE 1 OF 2 2025:BHC-AUG:9725 975 to 978.odt Writ Petitions, which were dismissed for non removal of office objections. Admittedly, no notices were issued to the Respondents in the original Petitions. Hence, notices to Respondents in these applications stand dispensed with. 2. Perusal of the applications indicate that sufficient reason has been recorded by the Applicants for condonation of delay of 79 days. Hence, applications stand allowed in terms of prayer clauses ‘B’ to ‘D’. 3. Learned Counsel for Petitioner seeks withdrawal of these Petitions with a liberty to file appropriate proceedings under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014. 4. In view of above, Petitions stand disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. The period consumed for prosecuting these Petitions shall be excluded while considering the issue of limitation. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) Umesh PAGE 2 OF 2