Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8665 (AP)

THE MUNCIPAL COMMISSIONER v. R.Subba Rao,

WP/4184/2019 · 2025-01-28

Challa Gunaranjan, Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARL- AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 4184 OF 2019 Between: The Municipal Commissioner, The Municipal Commissioner, Mydukur Municipality, Mydukur, Kadapa District. AND 1. R.Subba Rao, S/o.Subbanna, Aged 55 years, Occ.Sanitary Maistry, O/o. - ""Mydukur Municipality, Kadapa District. R/o.8/26, Burgola Veedhi, Proddatur Road, Mydukuru, Kadapa District. 2, A.Suryanarayana Rao, S/o.Venkata Ramaiah, Aged 47 years, Occ.Sanitary Maistry, O/o. Mydukur Municipality, Kadapa District. R/o.H.No. 10/92-43, Sheelam Nagar, Budvel Road,Mydukuru, Kadapa District. 3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, to Government, M. A. and U. D(G-2) Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, _ Amaravathi,Guntur District. 4. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, to Government, Finance and Planning Department, Secretaraiat,Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. The Commissioner and Director of Municipal Administration, State of AP, Sri Krishna Enclave, Annapurna Nagar, 5th Lane, 4/7 Inner ring Road, Gorantia, Guntur, Guntur District. 6. The District Collector, Kadapa, Kadapa District. Petitioner ...RESPONDENTS TT f Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to and in connection with the orders passed by the AP Administrative Tribunal in OA No. 1817 of 2018 dated 29-08-2018 and quash or set aside the same as being legally untenable, erroneous and contrary to law. lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dated 29-08-2018 in OA No.1817 of 2018 passed by the AP Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad pending disposal of the above writ petition. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to file the reply affidavit in WP No. 4184 of 2019 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the PetitionerSRI P C REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.1,2: SRI T JANARDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondents No.3,5,6: GP FOR MUNICIPAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR FINANCE AND PLANNING The Court made the following: ORDER 1 (RNT,J &CGR,J W.P.N0.4184 OF 2019 ) t APHC010094182019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3509] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 4184/2019 Between: The Muncipal Commissioner ...PETITIONER AND R Subba Rao and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.PC REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING (AP) 2.T JANARDHAN RAO 3.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following: ORDER :- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner/Municipal Commissioner, being aggrieved from the order, dated 29.08.2018 passed 2 (RNTJ & CGR,J W.P.N0.4184 0F 2019 ) in O.A.No.1817 of 2018 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (in short Tribunal’), Hyderabad. Today, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Sri T.Janardhan Rao, learned counsel for respondents 1 & 2 3. is present. The Writ Petition is dismissed “for want of prosecution”. 4. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending shall also stand closed. Sd/- A. VUAYA BABU assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, K One CC to SRI. P. C. REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] JANARDHAN RAO, Advocate [OPUC] MUNICIPAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT, High 2. One CC to SRI. T. 3. Two CCs to GP FOR Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] finance and planning, High Court of Andhra Two CCs to GP FOR Pradesh [OUT] s'ThreeC.D.Copies nm HIGH COURT DATED:28/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.4184 of 2019 ^ 18 FEB 2025 y . Current Section . DISMISING THE WP FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS