Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86625 (PNJ)

CHANDIMANDIR STONE CRUSHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/23172/2024 · 2025-05-08

Kuldeep Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (245) Chandimandir Stone Crusher State of Haryana CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. Court, that the grievance of the petitioner has been addressed, and therefore, the prayer made in the instant writ petition is rendered infructuous. 2. been rendered infructuous. May 08, 2025 Manpreet IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Chandimandir Stone Crusher Versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Sumeet Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Gaur, Addl. AG, Haryana. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner Court, that the grievance of the petitioner has been addressed, and therefore, the prayer made in the instant writ petition is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the instant writ petition is been rendered infructuous. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23172-2024 Date of Decision : 08.05.2025 …Petitioner Versus ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Rajesh Gaur, Addl. AG, Haryana. learned counsel for the petitioner informs this Court, that the grievance of the petitioner has been addressed, and therefore, the prayer made in the instant writ petition is rendered infructuous. ant writ petition is disposed of as having (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No informs this Court, that the grievance of the petitioner has been addressed, and therefore, disposed of as having MANPREET SINGH 2025.05.09 14:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment