PARVATHI M @ SHRUTHI v. B CHANDRASHEKAR @ SUNIL RAJ
RPFC/71/2019 · 2025-07-21
Lalitha Kanneganti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86624 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86624 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27856 RPFC No. 71 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 71 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
1.
M. PARVATHI @ SHRUTHI AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, W/O B. CHANDRASHEKAR @ SUNIL RAJ, D/O M. MAHADEVASWAMY,
2.
SRUJAN RAJ S.
AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS, S/O B. CHANDRASHEKAR @ SUNIL RAJ,
(SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER M. PARVATHI, THE 1ST PETITIONER HEREIN)
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.92, 13TH MAIN ROAD, KALIDASA ROAD, ANANTHAMURTHY BADAVANE, SRINAGARA, BENGALURU-560 050. …PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. NANJUNDARADHYA B.G., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
B. CHANDRASHEKAR @ SUNIL RAJ S/O LATE B. BASAVARAJU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT NO.2329, 9TH CROSS, BASAVESHWARA ROAD, K.R. MOHALLA, MYSURU-570 008. …RESPONDENT
(V/O.DATED 12.01.2024, NOTICE TO RESPONDENT IS HELD SUFFICIENT)
Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27856 RPFC No. 71 of 2019
THIS RPFC IS FILED U/S.19(4) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT, 1984, PRAYING TO (A) SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 04.12.2018 PASSED BY THE LEARNED II ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT MYSURU IN C.MIS.251/2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER
In this matter, right from 2.4.2024, whenever the matter is listed before this Court, atleast on five occasions there is no representation and again on 18.7.2025, when the matter was listed, even on that day there was no representation on behalf of both the parties. Hence, the matter was listed today for 'dismissal'.
2. Today, also there is no representation. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
TL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6