- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38884 WP No. 24138 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 24138 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MUNIYAMMA W/O LATE SURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS. R/AT. NO.53/1, ANANTHAPUR VILLAGE, MUNESHWARA SWAMY TEMPLE ROAD, SINGANAYAKANAHALLI POST, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU-560064. 2. SRI. S. MUNIYAPPA S/O D. SURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT. NO.53/1, ANANTHAPUR VILLAGE, MUNESHWARA SWAMY TEMPLE ROAD, SINGANAYAKANAHALLI POST, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU-560064. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. LEELADHAR H P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SPECIAL ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVAN, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, BENGALURU-560001. Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38884 WP No. 24138 of 2025 2. THE TAHASILDAR, YELAHANKA BENGALURU ADDITIONAL TALUK BENGALURU-560064 3. THE COMMANDANT CRPF YELAHANKA GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ANATHAPUR VILLAGE, DODDABALLAPURA ROAD, BENGALURU 560064 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. SESHU., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS DATED 08.01.2025 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN DISMISSING APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONERS IN CASE NO.RA-BNA-526/2016-2017 RD NO. RD0050000044252 FOR CHALLENGING THE MUTATION IN MR.H-4 DATED 6.10.2015 IN RESPECT OF SY. NO.37 OF ANANTHAPURA VILLAGE YELAHANKA-1 HOBLI YELAHANKA TALUK UNDER ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38884 WP No. 24138 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned HCGP takes notice for respondents No.1 and 2. Learned Central Government Counsel Sri. B.Pramod, who is present before the Court takes notice for respondent No.3. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 and the learned HCGP raise an objection that the petitioners are seeking to raise a challenge to an order passed by the Assistant Commissioner under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act (for short, 'the Act'), while an efficacious alternative remedy is available for the petitioners to approach the Deputy Commissioner under Section 136(3) of the Act. 3. Upholding the contention of the learned counsel for respondent No.3 and learned HCGP, the writ petition stands disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioners to redress their grievance. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38884 WP No. 24138 of 2025 4. Office is directed to return the original documents / certified copies, if any, to the petitioners, while retaining a copy of the same for the file. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE MKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3