- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54242 WP No. 13918 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY WRIT PETITION NO. 13918 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PARVATHAMMA T.S W/O SIDDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 83 YRS R/AT S L V RAAYALA NESS APARTMENT NO.16 F 3 4TH CROSS NEAR MALLESHWARAM RAILWAY STATION GAYATHRI NILAYA STATION, GAYATHRI NAGARA MARUTHI BADAVANE, BANGALORE - 21. 2. SRI RANGANATHA @ BABU S/O MUNIRANGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT JAKKANAHALLI THYAMAGONDLU HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK - 562 123. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. SIRI RAJASHEKAR, ADV., FOR SRI SARAVANA S, ADV.) AND: 1. SRI LAXMINARASIMAHAIAH T S/O LATE THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS. 2. SMT. MANJULAMMA W/O LATE NAGARAJU T AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 3. SRI MOHAN KUMAR N S/O LATE NAGARAJU T AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS. Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54242 WP No. 13918 of 2021 4. SRI SHANKAR GURU N.N S/O LATE NAGARAJU T AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS. 5. SRI SIDDARAJU T S/O LATE THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS ALLA R/AT BYRAMMA LAYOUT SONDEKOPA ROAD NELAMANGALA TOWN - 562 123. 6. SMT. SHRADAMMA W/O C. NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YERS R/AT OBALAPURA HOBLI,, NELAMANGALA TALUK - 562 123. 7. SMT. SUJAATH D/O SIDDEBYREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YRS C/O NARASIMHA MURTHI R/AT LAKSHMANAPPA LAYOUT SUBASHA NAGARA NELAMAGNAALA TOWN - 562 123. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K.R. GANGEGOWDA, ADV., FOR C/R-1 TO R-5; R-6 & R-7 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED IN M.A.NO.12/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. SR.CIVIL JUDGE, NELAMANGALA, DATED 15.07.2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-F. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54242 WP No. 13918 of 2021 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that suit in O.S.No.60 of 2020 out of which this writ petition arises has been already disposed of. Therefore, this writ petition does not survive for consideration. She has filed a memo to the said effect. 2. The submission and memo taken on record. Writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE NMS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33