Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8661 (RAJ)

RAM KRIPAL SISODIA S/O SH. SULTAN SHAH SISODIA v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

CW/4364/2023 · 2025-04-23

Anand Sharma, Shree Chandrashekhar

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4364/2023 Ram Kripal Sisodia Son of Shri Sultan Shah & Another ----Petitioners Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Another ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Javed Khan Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Siddharth Bapna Advocate with Mr. Sarvesh Jain Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 23/04/2025 1. Mr. Ram Kripal Sisodia and Mr. Ramdhan Meena approach this Court with the following prayers:- “In light of the facts and circumstances of the case, averments made hereinabove as well as the settled legal position, it is therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow the instant writ petition and - a) Issue writ in the nature of Mandamus of any other appropriate Writ or Order directing the Respondents to issue appropriate instructions to the concerned Revenue Authority i.e. Tehsildar – Amer [Dist. - Jaipur] for revoking/removing the entry of attachment reflecting the Revenue Records in respect of the immovable and movable properties enumertated in Para 11 of this Writ Petition; and b) Direct the Respondents to pay costs of the present writ petition to the petitioners; and c) Grant any other relief as the Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper under the present facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. By an order dated 15th May 2024, the writ petition qua Ram Kripal Sisodia was dismissed. 3. Mr. Javed Khan, the learned counsel appearing for Ramdhan Meena and Mr. Siddharth Bapna, the learned counsel appearing for (2 of 2) [CW-4364/2023] Union of India agree that by virtue of the decision rendered by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Review Petition (Civil) No. 359 of 2023 in Civil Appeal No. 5783 of 2022 titled “Union of India & Anr. Vs. M/s Ganpati Dealcom Private Limited”, the present writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Disposed of as such. 5. Needless to indicate that the consequences shall follow. (ANAND SHARMA),J (SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR),J DIVYA SAINI /109