Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8661 (AP)

G. TEJASRI v. G. ANIL KUMAR

CRP/865/2019 · 2025-01-24

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010094782019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: Between: G. Tejasri and Others G Anil Kumar Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 865/2019 ...PETITIONER(S) AND ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner(S): KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3505] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT Order: 1. The present revision is filed against the order dated 22.01.2019 in I.A.No.940 of 2018 in O.S.No.295 of 2018, on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gudivada, Krishna District. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 3. The submission is placed on record. 4. In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision and accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR 24.01. 2025 TJN 246 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 865/2019 24.01.2025 TJN