Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86586 (ALL)

COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT VIKRAM INTER COLLEGE MOHAAMMADPUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/12064/2025 · 2025-08-21

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:144626 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12064 of 2025 Petitioner :- Committee Of Management Vikram Inter College Mohaammadpur And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manisha Chaturvedi,Smt. Chandra Kala Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shiv Raj Singh Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent concern to decide upon the pending application dated 12.06.2025 moved by the petitioner before the respondent no.2 decision seeking approval upon the resolution dated 08.06.2025 to terminate the services of Sri Manvendra Vidyarthi within a reasonable time period. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 30.07.2025 passed by the District Inspector of Schools, Azamgarh (Annexure No.1 to the writ petition). III. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to give effect to the impugned order dated 30.07.2025 passed by the District Inspector of Schools, Azamgarh, in the interest of justice." 2. Ms. Manisha Chaturvedi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted on instructions that she is not pressing the prayer no.2. 3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioners may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. 5. Heard Ms. Manisha Chaturvedi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Sri Awadhesh Kumar Mishra, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 6. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Petitioners are directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 within a week from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.2, District Inspector of Schools, District Azamgarh is directed to decide the said representation after giving opportunity of hearing to both the parties, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 7. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Order Date :- 22.8.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad