Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86581 (ALL)

ANUJ RAJ VATS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/27722/2025 · 2025-09-21

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 27722 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "(1) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned letter/order/communication dated 05/05/2025 issued/passed by respondent no.2. (Annexure no.8 to this writ petition). (ii) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to revaluate the copy of Applied Mathematics-II in which he has appeared on 29/12/2024 during special back examination. paper for his CSE Diploma Examination." 2. Sri D.K. Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents, on instructions, submitted that the scrutiny has already been conducted and result has been declared on 19.08.2025. Therefore, no purpose left to keep the matter pending for further adjudication by this Court. He has placed the written instructions before the Court, which is taken on record. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the scrutiny of subject of re-examination has been done and result has been declared, but scrutiny of actual examination has not been done. 4. I have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri D.K. Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents and perused the written instructions. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sapan Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Anuj Raj Vats .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. I do not find any force in the arguments advanced by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner to re-scrutinize the earlier examination, which has been conducted on the earlier occasion. 6. Taking into consideration the written instructions and submissions made by learned counsel for the respective respondents, I do not find any merit in the instant writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. September 22, 2025 Atul WRIC No. 27722 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad