[2025:RJ-JP:8672] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10007/2011 1. Smt. Munni Devi Mishra W/o Late Sh. Hari Shankar Mishra 2. Manish Mishra S/o Late Sh. Hari Shankar Mishra 3. Nishi Mishra D/o Late Sh. Hari Shankar Mishra 4. Sweety Mishra D/o Late Sh. Hari Shankar Mishra, All R/o Plot No. 4, Teachers Colony, D.c.m. Ajmer Road, Jaipur 5. Smt. Meenu Mishra W/o. Sh. Pankaj Mishra, 46, Alpana Colony, Jhotwara, Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Secretary Public Works Department, Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Chief Engineer, P.w.d. B. And R., Jacob Road, Rajasthan Jaipur 3. The Executive Engineer Head Quarter, P.w.d. B. And R., Jacob Road, Rajasthan Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : None present JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 27/02/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing direction to the respondents to release retiral dues as per the directions issued by the Division Bench of this Court. 2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the parties. 3. Perusal of the reply submitted by the respondents indicates that the appeal was decided by the Division Bench vide order dated 26.11.2002 and after disposal of the said appeal an amount [2025:RJ-JP:8672] (2 of 2) [CW-10007/2011] of Rs.76,125/- as interest along-with retiral dues was paid to the petitioner in the year 2003. 4. Looking to the explanation furnished by the respondents in the reply, this writ petition has become infructuous. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) stand disposed of. 6. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to move appropriate application before the respondents in case any grievance still survives. 7. In case, such application is submitted by the petitioners with the respondent-authorities within a period of one month from today, it is expected from the authorities concerned to decide the said application by passing a reasoned and a speaking order strictly in accordance with law. 8. Since the petitioner has remained unrepresented before this Court, Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioners on his residential address mentioned in the memo of writ petition for their intimation/information. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/96