HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17999 of 2025 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents has pointed out that in the instant case, the petitioner namely, Smt. Urmila Devi, has already passed away and as such, no further order could be passed therein and the instant petition may be dismissed as abated, since till date, no substitution application has been filed on her behalf. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid fact. 3. In view thereof, the instant petition is dismissed as abated leaving it open to the convicted accused Kailash Chandra to avail the remedies, as available to him, in accordance with the law. 4. It is made clear that dismissal of the instant writ petition will not in any way affect the rights of the accused- Kailash Chandra. September 22, 2025 Sachin Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Peeyush Kumar Pathak, Prateeyush Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Urmila Devi .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad