DR.R.ARUNACHALAM v. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
WA/1767/2024 · 2025-12-18
D K Singh, Tara Vitasta Ganju
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86488 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86488 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54424-DB WA No. 1767 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT APPEAL NO. 1767 OF 2024 (LA-KHB) BETWEEN:
DR.R. ARUNACHALAM PROPRIETOR, PROPERTY CONSULTANT AND PROMOTER PVT. LTD., AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.274-A, 3RD STAGE, BEML LAYOUT, RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 098. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ABHINAV RAMANAND, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. T N VISWANATHA., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
2.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VACHAN .B, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 AND R2)
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54424-DB WA No. 1767 of 2024
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN REVIEW PETITION NO.425/2024 AND THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 28/08/2024 PASSED ON IA NO.1 SEEKING TO CONDONE THE DELAY OF 4398 DAYS AND IA NO.2 OF STAY OF THE ORDER DATED 26/07/2012 IN WP NO.45696/2011 IN REVIEW PETITION NO.425/2024 ON THE FILE OF THIS HONBLE COURT BE SET ASIDE AND THIS WRIT APPEAL MAY BE ALLOWED WITH COSTS.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
The present writ appeal is filed impugning the judgment and order dated 28.08.2024 passed in R.P.No.425/2024. The review petition has been filed by the Bengaluru Development Authority seeking review of the judgment and order dated 26.07.2012 passed in writ petition No.45696/2011 preferred by the appellant.
2. The learned Single Judge vide detailed judgment passed in the review petition has condoned delay in filing the writ petition of 4398 days. The review petition is still pending for final decision. When the matter is at large before the
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54424-DB WA No. 1767 of 2024
learned Single Judge, we do not want to interdict the proceedings pending before the learned Single Judge at this stage. However, we request the learned Single Judge to expedite the hearing of the review petition and take steps for disposing of the same expeditiously.
3. With the aforesaid observations, the writ appeal is
disposed of. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
4. All contentions of the parties including the challenge to the order impugned in this writ appeal at the appropriate stage are left open.
(D K SINGH) JUDGE
(TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE
RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10 Digitally signed by DINESH KUMAR SINGH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA Digitally signed by TARA VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA