NAUSIMA ALIAS NAUSIYA BANO v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
WRIC/27710/2025 · 2025-09-08
Prakash Padia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86478 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86478 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 27710 of 2025 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
1. Heard Sri D. K. Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Kartikey Saran, learned Additional Advocate General for State of U.P. along-with Sri Dharmendra Prasad Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent- State.
2. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court dated 19.08.2025 personal affidavit has been filed by the District Magistrate, Prayagraj today in the Court, same is taken on record.
3. In paragraph-12 of the aforesaid instructions monthly disposal of succession based fire-arm license cases from April 2025 to July2025 is mentioned. It is further stated that as on date total number of pending succession based fire-arm applications are 1359 in the office of respondent no.2. In so far as case of the petitioner is concerned, it is stated that vide order dated 02.09.2025 respondent no.2 rejected the claim of the petitioner.
4. After going through the same, it is argued by counsel for the petitioner that the relief sought for by the petitioner in the present writ petition has been granted hence present writ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : D.K.Ojha, Mudit Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Nausima Alias Nausiya Bano .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s)
petition has become infructuous.
5. In this view of the matter, present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. September 9, 2025 Pramod Tripathi WRIC No. 27710 of 2025 2 (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad