IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86463 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2023 Thana- UJIYARPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Kumod Kumar @ Kumod Ray @ Kumod Ranjan @ Kumud Ranjan S/O Sone Lal Ray @ Sharma Nand Ray R/O Village- Lohagir, P.S. Ujiarpur, Dist.- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mritunjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 2 28-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 354B, 379, 427, 448, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. According to the FIR, all the accused persons including the petitioner came to the door of the informant and entered inside his house, damaged the household articles and committed loot-paat. All the accused persons assaulted the informant and his family members with lathi, danda and khanti casing injury. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that occurrence took place on 08.03.2023 but the FIR has been lodged on 22.03.2023 after delay of 14 days Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86463 of 2024(2) dt.28-01-2025 2/2 without explaining any reasonable cause of delay. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. He submits that the injury found upon the victim is simple in nature. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has three criminal antecedents as stated in para-3 of the bail application and he is languishing in judicial custody since 06.10.2024. 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Ujiarpur P.S. Case No. 90 of 2023, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and if he fails to appear on two consecutive dates his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled. devendra/- (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) U T