MANWELL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS v. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER
WP/35957/2024 · 2025-10-15
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86414 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86414 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40828 WP No. 35957 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 35957 OF 2024 (L-PF) BETWEEN:
MANWELL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS 445, 65TH CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560010 ESTABLISHMENT ID- BGBNG0025879000.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MANJU PRABHU C S/O. CHITTI BABU A NO.445, 65TH CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, NEAR BHASYAM CIRCLE, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560010. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.DHIKSHIT U., ADVOCATE)
AND:
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN NO.13, RAJA RAM MOHAN ROY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560025. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.B.PRAMOD., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40828 WP No. 35957 of 2024
ORAL ORDER Sri.Dhikshit.U., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.B.Pramod., counsel for the respondent have appeared in person.
2. Though the matter is listed today for orders, it is heard.
3. The
order dated 26.07.2024 passed by the respondent vide Annexure-G is called into question in this Writ Petition on several grounds as setout in the Memorandum of Writ Petition.
4. Counsel for the respective parties urged several
contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care.
5. The order passed under Section 14B of the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 is called into question in this Writ Petition on several grounds as set-out in the Memorandum of Writ Petition. Suffice it to note that there is an alternate statutory remedy of filing an
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40828 WP No. 35957 of 2024
appeal against the 14B order. Hence, I decline to exercise power under writ jurisdiction.
6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of and interim direction if any stands discharged.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE KMV,MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4