137/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA SANTRO DEVI VINEET GARG IAS AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Ravinder Malik (Ravi), Mr. Pawan Kumar HARKESH MANUJA In view of the speaking order dated 03.01.2025 passed by respondents whereby, the petitioner regularization, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Simultaneously, learned counsel for respondents on instructions from Mr. Alok Sheokand, Assistant O/o Divisional Forest Officer, Kaithal subm favour of the petitioner against regular posts besides release of all financial benefits shall be concluded within a period of 6 weeks from today. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the peti IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: SANTRO DEVI Versus VINEET GARG IAS AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Ravinder Malik (Ravi), Advocate for the Mr. Pawan Kumar Longia, DAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) In view of the speaking order dated 03.01.2025 passed by respondents whereby, the petitioner has regularization, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Simultaneously, learned counsel for respondents on instructions from Mr. Alok Sheokand, Assistant O/o Divisional Forest Officer, Kaithal submits that the necessary order of appointment in favour of the petitioner against regular posts besides release of all financial benefits shall be concluded within a period of 6 weeks from In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the peti IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP- 3216 -2024 Date of Decision: January 08, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. Longia, DAG, Haryana. In view of the speaking order dated 03.01.2025 passed by has been found entitled for regularization, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the Simultaneously, learned counsel for respondents on instructions from Mr. Alok Sheokand, Assistant O/o Divisional Forest its that the necessary order of appointment in favour of the petitioner against regular posts besides release of all financial benefits shall be concluded within a period of 6 weeks from In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be 2024 January 08, 2025 In view of the speaking order dated 03.01.2025 passed by been found entitled for regularization, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the Simultaneously, learned counsel for respondents on instructions from Mr. Alok Sheokand, Assistant O/o Divisional Forest its that the necessary order of appointment in favour of the petitioner against regular posts besides release of all financial benefits shall be concluded within a period of 6 weeks from In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner in case the needful is not done within the TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.01.10 09:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-3216-2024 -2- at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/- as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. 08.01.2025 (HARKESH MANUJA) Tejwinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.01.10 09:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document