MRS. CLOTILDA ALMEIDA v. MR. VINCY DEEPCHAND D SOUZA
RFA/2347/2023 · 2025-09-15
K S Hemalekha
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86394 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86394 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2347 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
1 . MRS. CLOTILDA ALMEIDA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, D/O LATE ASSUMPTION D SOUZA @ ASSESSA BAI, R/AT ALMEIDA VILLA, KOKRANI VILLAGE, KAKWA POST, MULKI.
2 . MR PLASID D SOUZA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, S/O LATE ASSUMPTION D SOUZA @ ASSESSA BAI, R/AT KOKRANI VILLAGE, KAKWA POST, MULKI.
3 . MRS JANAT PINTO AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, D/O LATE ASSUMPTION D SOUZA @ ASSESSA BAI, R/AT HUDCO COLENY, MANAMPADY VILLAGE, MULKI.
4 . MR RONALD D SOUZA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O LATE ASSUMPTION D SOUZA @ ASSESSA BAI, R/AT MANAMPADY VILLAGE, NEAR ANEKATTU, MULKI.
RFA.No.2347/2023 ----------------------
2 5 . MRS HILDA RODRIGUES AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O LATE ASSUMPTION D SOUZA @ ASSESSA BAI, R/AT MANAMPADY VILLAGE, NEAR ANEKATTU, MULKI. ...Appellants (By SRI.PRASANNA V.R., Advocate)
AND:
MR. VINCY DEEPCHAND D SOUZA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O MR VINCENT D SOUZA, R/AT MANAMPADY VILLAGE, MULKI, MANGALURU TALUK D K
REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER AND G.P.A HOLDER MR VINCENT D SOUZA AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS S/O LATE MARIAN D SOUZA, R/AT MANAMPADY VILLAGE, MULKY, MANGALURU TALUK, D K DISTRICT
……..Respondent
(By SRI.K.CHANDRANATH ARIGA, Advocate for C/R) Notice issued to R2 but unserved)
This Regular First Appeal filed U/S 96 R/W order 41 Rule 1 of CPC., against the Judgment and Decree dated 07.08.2023 passed in O.S. No.50/2023 on the file of SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MOODBIDRI, D.K., decreeing the suit for declaration and injunction.
RFA.No.2347/2023 ----------------------
3 This Regular First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER
Four weeks time is granted to file paper book, failing which the appeal would stand dismissed without reference to the Bench.
Sd/- JUDGE
NOTE: Vide Court Order dt.15.09.2025, the advocate for appellant has not filed paper book. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. .
COPY
Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : MK R By : RM C By : STE