Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8639 (UTT)

REKHA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/1161/2025 · 2025-07-07

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:5802 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No. 1161 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Ms. Sadaf, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mrs. Pushpa Bhatt, learned AAG for the State. 3. Present applicant– Rekha W/o Shri Rajesh Kumar is seeking regular bail in relation to first information report dated 18.10.2024, bearing FIR No.0595 of 2024, Police Station Gangnahar, District Haridwar, wherein the present applicant, her brother-in- law and one Hasita along with ten unknown persons have been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 3(5), 109(1) 115(2), 117(2), 127(2), 324(4) of BNS, 2023. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated. She also submits that there is a dispute in respect of a leased property, however, in this FIR, the charge-sheet has already been filed, and as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the husband of the present applicant, namely, Rajesh Kumar, was also implicated, who was granted bail by this Court vide order dated 20.03.2025. 6. On the other side, learned State counsel have not disputed this fact that the charge- sheet has already been filed, and as such, at this juncture, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant, and, furthermore, the husband of the present applicant has already been bailed out by this Court. 7. Mr. Bharat Singh, learned counsel for 2025:UHC:5802 the respondent, has opposed the bail application. 8. After hearing the arguments as advanced by learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that since the charge-sheet has already been filed and as such there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant, therefore, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 9. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the present bail application is allowed. 10. Let the applicant, namely “Rekha” be released on bail, on her executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 07.07.2025 R.Bisht 2025:UHC:5802