Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8638 (BOM)

SHIVAJI NAGORAO UMATE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/1936/2025 · 2025-02-18

Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Prafulla S Khubalkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

27 WP NO. 1936 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1936 OF 2025 SHIVAJI NAGORAO UMATE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS … Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Arunkumar Mukhedkar AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 : Mr. R. K. Ingole … CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR , JJ. DATE : 18.02.2025 PER COURT : . The claim of damages, pursuant to the extant policy that was prevalent for damage to the sugarcane crops due to faulty electrical lines of the respondent, is a subject matter. The incident had taken place way back in the year 2015, though the petitioner is pointing out some favourable report of the electrical inspector dated 14.12.2015 (Exhibit – ‘G’), in our considered view, the claim is hopelessly time-barred. No writ under article 226 of the constitution can be issued. 2. The writ petition is dismissed. (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) jhs/ 1/1 2025:BHC-AUG:4753-DB