SRI S G LAKSHMIPATHI v. THE REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
WP/25565/2022 · 2025-12-09
E S Indiresh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86363 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86363 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52094 WP No. 25565 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.25565 OF 2022 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. S.G.LAKSHMIPATHI S/O LATE D.B.GANESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
2.
SMT. AMRUTHA W/O LAKSHMIPATHI S.G, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.15, SUVARNA NAGARA, DODDABIDARAKALLU NAGASANDRA POST BENGALURU - 560 073. …PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. A.M. MAHESHWARAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES NO.1, ALI ASKAR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 052.
2.
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, MAHILA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,
Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52094 WP No. 25565 of 2022
NO.14, SOUTH END ROAD, SHESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 020.
3.
THE BRANCH MANAGER, MAHILA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, BASAVESHWARANAGAR BRANCH, BENGALURU - 560 079.
4.
THE BRANCH MANAGER MAHILA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED SESHADRIPURAM BENGALURU - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. B.S. MAHENDRA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R4)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT BANK IN VIEW OF THE PAYMENT OF RS.
10,00,000/- ON 17./18.11.2022 AND TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONERS DATED 20.05.2022 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A7 TO THE WP AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52094 WP No. 25565 of 2022
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.3 and 4 has filed a memo stating that the Loan Account of the petitioners is already closed. In that view of the matter, no further orders are required to be made in this writ petition.
2. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SMJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9