2025:UHC:8690 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No. 1163 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Nishant Krishna Adhikari and Mr. Devaansh Singh, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The present applicant ‘Ravi Singh’ S/o Surender Singh is praying for bail in relation to First Information Report dated 31.01.2025 bearing FIR No. 0047 of 2025 P.S. Nehru Colony, District Dehradun, wherein the present applicant has been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 308(5), 351(2), 352 of BNS, 2023 and 67-D of IT Act. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and not named in the FIR. In the FIR, four mobile phones were mentioned, which does not belong to the present applicant. He further submits that without collecting credible evidence, applicant has been arrested and no money was credited in his account. He further submits that only on the statement of co-accused Sachin, applicant has been implicated. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that for the same case, case crime no. 47 of 2025, one FIR has been registered in Ranchi. 5. Apart from this, he submits that charge- sheet has been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant and furthermore, the applicant have no previous criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 13.03.2025. He also claims parity of the other co- accused Vishal Tiwari, who was already granted bail by this court on 11.06.2025. 6. On the other side, learned State counsel has not disputed this fact that charge-sheet has been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant and this is a case of parity. 7. Learned State counsel has placed before this 2025:UHC:8690 court account statement of co-accused Sachin. On perusal of the account statement it reveals that money was transferred in the account of co- accused Sachin on 06.01.2025 and not in the account of present applicant. 8. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that there is no such document which reveals that amount has been credited in the account of present applicant and since, charge-sheet has been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation, this court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 9. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, bail application is allowed. 10. Let the applicant ‘Ravi Singh’ be released on bail, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 25.09.2025 PR 2025:UHC:8690