Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86350 (KAR)

GOPAL PANDURANG GOUDA PATIL, v. THE UNION OF INDIA

WP/36158/2025 · 2025-12-18

Ashok S Kinagi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54247 WP No. 36158 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 36158 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: 1. GOPAL PANDURANG GOUDA PATIL, S/O PANDURANG, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/AT NO.13, 8TH MAIN ROAD, 3RD CROSS APOORVA LAYOUT, KENGERI UPANAGARA, BENGALURU- 560 060. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYANA BHAT MOVVAR., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCE AND PENSIONS, DEPT OF PERSONNEL AND TRAINING, REPRSENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, BLOCK NO.12 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI 110003. 2. THE UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS EAST BLOCK V, RK PURAM, NEW DELHI 110066. 3. THE STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY BLOCK NO.12, CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI-110003. 4. THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL SASHASTRA SEEMA BAL EAST BLOCK, V RK PURAM, NEW DELHI-110066. 5. THE SECOND IN COMMAND AND THE PRESIDING OFFICER DV/DME OF CE (GD) -2024 RECTT CENTRE 44TH BN ITBP MOHLA, CHATTISGARH -491666. 6. THE DEPUTY COMMANDANT/ADJUTANT Digitally signed by SHILPABAI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54247 WP No. 36158 of 2025 REGIONAL TRAINING CENTRE, SASHASTRA SEEMA BAL, GORAKHPUR, UTTAR PRADESH-273007. 7. THE COMMANDANT (PERS-II) DIRECTORATE GENERAL SAHASTRA SEEM BAL EAST BLOCK, V, RK PURAM, NEW DELHI-110066. 8. THE REGIONAL OFFICE-SSC REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR FIRST FLOOR, `E' WING KENDRIYA SADAN, KORAMANGALA BANGALORE-560034. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.S.RAJASHEKAR., ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS OF NOTIFICATION PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A PERTAINING TO THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER AND GRANT HIM THE FOLLOWING RELIEFS. (A) DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO. 3 TO 8 TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER FOR APPOINTMENT TO BSF, CRPF OR ITBP AS A UR CANDIDATE, TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. (B) DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO. 3 TO ACT UPON THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 22.10.2024 MADE BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 5 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-J TO APPOINT THE PETITIONER BY TREATING THE HIM AS A UR/GM CANDIDATE, TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE (C) DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO. 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 06.06.2025 MADE BY THE PETITIONER PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-Q 7, TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. (D) GRANT COSTS OF THE PETITION.GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO REPORT FOR DUTY EITHER IN BSF, CRPF OR ITBP AS AN UR CANDIDATE, TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE HAVING REGARD TO THE ENDORSEMENT MADE AT ANNEXURE- J BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT, DURING THE PENDENCY OF THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54247 WP No. 36158 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER The petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking a Mandamus directing respondents 3 to 8 to consider the case of the petitioner for the appointment to BSF, CRPF or ITBP as UR candidate, sought a Mandamus directing respondent No.3 to act upon the endorsement dated 22.10.2024, made by respondent No.5 vide Annexure-J to appoint the petitioner by treating him as UR/GM candidate, and also sought a Mandamus to consider the representation dated 06.06.2025 made by the petitioner to respondent No.3 vide Annexure-Q7 dated:06.06.2025. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents filed a memo along with a communication dated 16.12.2025, wherein it is stated in paragraph No.3 which reads as follows: "3. SCC further directed that, offer of appointment and appointment order may be issued to the above petitioner/ candidates on - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54247 WP No. 36158 of 2025 receipt of their dossiers from concerned Recruitment Center (RA) (CRPF). However, dossiers of the above re-allocated candidates has not been received by this HQ. Hence, on receipt of dossiers, the same will be scrutinized by a constituted departmental board of officers of BSF and offer of appointment will be issued accordingly." 3. In view of the communication dated 16.12.2025, wherein the respondents after scrutinising the records, offered an appointment to the petitioner. In view of the same, nothing survives for consideration in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to complete the exercise of scrutinising, and offering of appointment within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20