Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8635 (CHH)

KUMARI KALPANA KRISHNA SWAMY PULLEWAR v. UNION OF INDIA

WPS/1269/2025 · 2025-02-25

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:9544 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1269 of 2025 Kumari Kalpana Krishna Swamy Pullewar D/o Late Shri Krishna Swamy Aged About 59 Years R/o Gudhyari Dendayal Nagar P.S. Ramnagar Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - Union Of India Ministry Of Railway Railway Recruitment Board Through Secretary Rail Bhawn New Delhi 110001 2 - South East Central Railway Through General Manager South East Center Railway Head Quarters Personnel Department Railway Recruitment Cell Rts Colony Bilaspur (C.G.) 495004 3 - Principal Chief Personal Officer South East Central Railway Head Quarters Personnel Department Railway Recruitment Cell Rts Colony Bilsapur (C.G.) 495004 4 - Sr. Division Commercial Manager South East Central Railway Raipur Division Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Sr. Division Personnel Officer South East Central Railway Raipur Division Raipur (C.G.) 6 - Sr. Division Personnel Officer (Comml Bills) South East Central Railway Raipur Division Raipur (C.G.) 7 - Division Railway Manager South East Central Railway Raipur Division Raipur (C.G.) 8 - The Chhattisgarh State Scheduled Tribes Commission Bhagat Singh Chowk Shankar Nagar Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Sajal Kumar Gupta, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 7 : Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, Central Government Counsel For Respondent No. 8 : Mr. Ravi Kumar Bhagat, Advocate BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.02.25 17:08:56 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 25.02.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to pursue all his remedy available to him under the law before the Central Administrative Tribunal. 2. Considering aforesaid submission, the present writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika