r% APHC010093082025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 527 OF 202^ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India dated 22-11-2024 passed in I.A.No.355 of setting 2024 in O.S.No.205/2015 on the file of Additional Junior Civil Judge, Pithapuram. Between: against the order 1. Chokka Kasiratnam, (Died) 2. Chokka Apparao. S/o.late Tatabbai, Hindu, aged 55 years, D.No.4- 74/A, Konapapapeta, Ponnada Grampanchayat, U.Kothapalli Pithapuram JCJC Limits. mandal. 3. Vasupalli Suseela, W/o.Apparao, Hindu, aged 41 years. House wife. D.No.4-70, Konapapapeta, Ponnada Grampanchyat, U.Kothapalli Mandal, Pithapuram JCJC Limits. 4. Mylapalli Yellayamma, W/o. Kodandarao, Hindu Housewife, aged 43 years. Gardens, D.No.2-4-10, Anapalavari Veedhi Rajahmundry, Rajahmundry JCJ. A.C. ...Petitioners/Plaintiffs AND 1. Pukkalla Tatarao, S/o. Yellayya, Hindu, aged 71 Konapapapeta, Ponnada Grampanchayat, U.Kothapalli Pithapuram JCJC Limits. 2. Smt Pukkalla Sai, W/o. Tatarao, Hindu, aged 61 years. Housewife Konapapapeta, Ponnada Grampanchayat, U.Kothapalli MandaL Pithapuram JCJC Limits. years, Mandal, ...Respondents/Defendants lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.205 of 2015 on the file of Additional Junior Civil Judge, Pithapuram pending disposal of the above CRP. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri T N M Ranga Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Sri T V Jaggi Reddy The Court made the following order: APHC010093082025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SjJS [3233] .‘I FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 527/2025 Between: 1.CHOKKA KASIRATNAM, (DIED)! S/0.LATE TATABBAI, HINDU, AGED 55 D.N0.4-74/A, KONAPAPAPETA, PONNADA 2.CHOKKA APPARAO YEARS GRAMPaNCmAYAI , u.kothapalli mandal, pithapuram jcjc LIMITS. ) y 3.VASUPALLI SUSEELA,, W/O.APPARAO, HINDU, AGED 41 YEARS. KONAPAPAPETA, PONNADA HOUSE GRAMPANCHYAT, U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL, PITHAPURAM JCJC LIMITS. IFE. D.NO.4-70, 4.MYLAPALLI YELLAYAMMA,, W/0. KODANDARAO, HINDU,AGED 43 YEARS. HOUSEWIFE, D.NO.2-4-10, ANAPALAVARI VEEDHI, A.C. GARDENS, RAJAHMUNDRY, RAJAHMUNDRY JCJ. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.PUKKALLA TATARAO, , S/0. YELLAYYA, HINDU, AGED 71 YEARS, KONAPAPAPETA, PONNADA GRAMPANCHAYAT, U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL, PITHAPURAM JCJC LIMITS. 2.SMT PUKKALLA SAI, W/O. TATARAO, HINDU, AGED 61 YEARS. HOUSEWIFE, KONAPAPAPETA, PONNADA GRAMPANCHAYAT, U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL, PITHAPURAM JCJC LIMITS. ...RESPONDENT(S): circumstances stated in the grounds Ted ^ ' ° " ‘he Pleased toPleased to allow the abo^CRP bv ?'d .! 2024 passed in I.A.No.355 of settina 2094 ^ n ^2’''''- jAJSIO: 1 OF 209^ Pstition under Section odo in the affidavit filed in support of the pefflon®,h^ m" circumstances stated Pleased to stay of ai, further prleedinos in o . of Additional Junior Civil JudL Pj^ ° S ^0.205 OF 2015 CRP and pass ® pending disposal Counsel for the Petitioner{S); 1TNMRANGARAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1-1V JAGGI REDDY on the file of pass on the file of the above 3 HBKM.J C.R.P.No.527 of 2025 The Court made the following ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. This revision is filed against the order in I.A.No.355 of 2024 in O.S.No.205 of 2015 on the file of Additional Junior Civil Judge, Pithapuram, dated 22.11.2024, in dismissing the said application to permit the petitioners/plaintiffs to make consequential amendments in the plaint. 2. As per the submissions of both the learned counsels, it appears that initially the suit was filed seeking grant of permanent injunction against the defendants with respect to the plaint schedule property. Subsequently, it appears that the plaintiffs filed l.A. seeking amendment of the prayer in l.A.No.95 of 2020 in the above said suit, which was allowed by the trial Court on 14.02.2020. Accordingly, the amendments were made. However, with the advice of the new counsel as contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner herein, the plaintiffs wanted to re-modify the prayer in the plaint, restricting their relief only for grant of permanent injunction with respect to the suit schedule property. For which, they sought for the consequential amendments as under: 3. “(i) Delete the Para 7A which was added as per the orders dated 14.02.2020 in I.A.No.95 of 2020. 4 HBKM.J * C.R.P.No.527 of 2025 (ii) Delete the Para 10(ii) in valuation para of the plaint which was added as per the orders dated 14.02.2020 in I.A.No;95 of 2020. (Ill) Amend the Para 11 by delete Para 11(e) of plaint (prayer portion of the plaint) which was added as per orders dated 14.02.2020 in I.A.No.95 of 2020.” 4. Accordingly, both the learned counsels suit is at the stage of completion of seeking re-opening of the suit at this now submit that the arguments. But. they are not stage, the petitioners only sought for the above said amendments in the plaint. But, as the petitioners/plaintiffs are not diligent while finalizing the pleadings at appropriate stage and as there is a delay in filing this application other side shall be suitably compensated with the , the payment of costs respondents/defendants before the one (1) week from today. Subject to necessary amendments of Rs.5,000/-, payable to the Court below within a period of payment of the said costs, the as mentioned above shall be affected in the plaint finally and it clear that the suit need not be is made re-opened, as both the learned counsels submit that it is at the stage of finality on completion of the arguments. Bearing it in mind, the above said situation. the trial Court shall dispose of the suit strictly in accordance with law. The order shall be communicated immediately, i involved in the suit. view of the urgency in 9 5 / 4 HBKM.J C.R.P.No.527 of 2025 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of, with costs. As a sequel. Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. SDI- B. PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division): Pithapuram, East Godavari District. One CC to Sri T N M Ranga Rao Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. T V Jaggi Reddy Advocate [OPUC] Two CD^ Copies \ 2. 3. 4. SAM high court BKM.J DATED:25/07/2025 ORDER CRP No. 527 of 2025 ^2 J JUL 2125 ^^^lurrent Sectjoux^^ disposing of the crlp