- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26340 W.P. No.8874/2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.8874/2020 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. M. RAMESH S/O G. MUNIREDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT. GONIGATTAPURA VILLAGE SARJAPURA HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGARAJ G.H. ADV.,) AND: 1. SMT. NANJAMMA W/O LATE SIDDACHARI AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS. 2. SRI. SAMPANGIRAMACHARI S/O LATE SIDDACHARI SINCE DEAD REP. BY LR'S. 3. SMT. PREMA W/O SAMPANGIRAMAHARI AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. 4. SMT. NIRMALA D/O SAMPANGIRAMAHARI AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS. 5. SRI. RAJASHEKARA S/O SAMPANGIRAMAHARI AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS. Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: High Court of karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26340 W.P. No.8874/2020 ALL ARE RESIDING AT KUGURU VILLAGE SARJAPURA HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT. 6. SRI. M. JAVEED SAB S/O A. MEHABOOB SAB AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.360 1ST SECTOR, EAR IDBI BANK H.S.R. LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 102. 7. SMT. SARASWATHI W/O NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT BEGIHALLI VILLAGE JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-560105. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.S. NAGAMANJU, ADV., FOR R1 & R7 R3 & R4 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED V/O/DTD:29.02.2024, R3 TO R5 ARE TREATED AS LR'S OF DECEASED R2 V/O/DTD:29.02.2024 NOTICE TO R5 H/S) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING OR SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 10/07/2020 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL IN O.S.NO.424/2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-G. ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONERS FILE UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC (IA NO.1) VIDE ANNEXURE-F & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26340 W.P. No.8874/2020 ORAL ORDER Sri.Nagaraj G.H., learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of this writ petition respondent Nos.1 to 5 have executed the sale deed in favour of the petitioner and submits that in view of the subsequent event this writ petition would not survive for consideration. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE ABK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31