Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8634 (AP)

Sri Lanjepalli Koteswara Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/4831/2025 · 2025-02-24

B S Bhanumathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010093522025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Sri Lanjepalli Koteswara Rao The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: 4831/2025 Sri Lanjepalli Koteswara Rao ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: [3311] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 BSB, J W.P.No.4831 of 2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “…to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the 2nd respondent in cancelling the authorization of the petitioner vide Rc.No.1355/62/2024-A, dated 29.01.2025 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19 & 21, consequently, set aside the same by continuing the petitioner as Fair Price shop dealer for Shop No.0717062 situated at Julakallu village, Piduguralla Mandal, Guntur, now Palnadu District and pass such orders as deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Heard Sri K.Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies appearing for the respondents. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this writ petition can be closed as the authorities restored the authorization of the petitioner after the order, dated 03.02.2025, in W.P.No.1624 of 2025, filed by the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ B.S BHANUMATHI, J 24-02-2025 RAR